Topics
Advertising and Marketing
Airline Industry
Animal Cruelty
Auto and Transportation
Business and Industry
Buyer Beware
Children and Family Concerns
Consumer Alerts
Crime & the Justice System
Drugs and Supplements
Education and Schools
Entertainment, Art & Artists
Environment
Finance and Investing
Food and Beverage
Fraud
Gambling
Government
Health, Nutrition & Fitness
History
Home and Real Estate
Insurance
Law and Politics
Medical Matters
Misc
News Media
Observations, Myths & Thoughts
Product Safety
Religion
Restaurants and Fast Food
Security and Terrorism
Society and Culture
Sports
Statistics and Studies
Surgery
The Business of Beauty
The Workplace
Travel and Recreation
|
FOOD LABELING DOUBLETALK
These days food companies may not bother with promoting or advertising any
RELIABLE "health" claims because they can instead simply make "structure" and/or
"function" claims, which many consumers feel "sound like" health claims, but are
instead UNRELIABLE claims backed up by neither evidence nor government approval.
Structure or function claims can state just about anything and possibly suffer
no government reprisals for misleading or deceiving the public! Studies point
out that consumers may not be able to easily distinguish between health claims
or function/structure claims. Many structure or function claims use "hollow
bombast" or "hype", words like "maintains", "supports", "optimizes" and/or
"enhances".
For example, if a product says "helps restore sexual performance" this is a
health claim but no government approval is needed to say "arouses sexual
desire". This is a structure or function claim. Other structure/function
claims used instead of health claims are as follows: "Helps maintain normal
cholesterol levels" instead of "lowers cholesterol". "Suppresses appetite to
aid weight loss" instead of "suppresses appetite to treat obesity". "Relieves
occasional heartburn" instead of "relieves persistent heartburn". Other "buzz
words" that indicate structure/function claims that need no government approval
are: Improves, promotes, boosts, for common symptoms, helps enhance, relieves,
and prevents.
The law says that structure or function claims cannot be misleading but the
Food And Drug Administration (FDA) has never said how much evidence is necessary
to substantiate a claim. The resulting "free-for-all" may confuse consumers.
The food supplement industry especially has received a free ride to make big
bucks with structure/function claims so why bother with health claims. However,
concerning structure/function claims, food companies do not even have to get
government approval like supplement companies do.
Further confusing consumers the FDA now allows health claims to be
advertised for foods based on preliminary evidence as long as somewhere on the
food package label, probably in small, fine print, it must say "this evidence is
not yet conclusive".
Remember, if consumers lose faith in food product or food supplement claims
because the FDA or U.S. Department Of Agriculture (USDA) too often chooses not
to enforce truth-in-labeling rules then, in time, the public may not end up
believing ANY claims!
SUPPLEMENTAL SOURCE: NUTRITION ACTION HEALTH LETTER JUNE 2003
Back
|