Topics
Advertising and Marketing
Airline Industry
Animal Cruelty
Auto and Transportation
Business and Industry
Buyer Beware
Children and Family Concerns
Consumer Alerts
Crime & the Justice System
Drugs and Supplements
Education and Schools
Entertainment, Art & Artists
Environment
Finance and Investing
Food and Beverage
Fraud
Gambling
Government
Health, Nutrition & Fitness
History
Home and Real Estate
Insurance
Law and Politics
Medical Matters
Misc
News Media
Observations, Myths & Thoughts
Product Safety
Religion
Restaurants and Fast Food
Security and Terrorism
Society and Culture
Sports
Statistics and Studies
Surgery
The Business of Beauty
The Workplace
Travel and Recreation
|
FOOD AND FOOD SUPPLEMENT CLAIMS
Too many food and food supplement processors may be using "skimpy"
evidence to make the claims they make in their advertisements and on
pakcage labels! How much evidence does it take to make a
substantiated claim in an ad anyway? Apparently it takes just one
good study or numerous questionable studies and all the evidence or
research results do not even need to be completely collected and/or
compiled yet to get away with using the potentially suspect evidence
or biased results to make claims. To date, the U.S. government has no
concrete, set standards for everyone to follow, so conceivably
advertisers can for a time get away with claiming almost anything in
their ads and on package labels. As usual it is buyer beware!
Claims supposedly supported by "well-controlled clinical studies"
may be supported by little or no scientific evidence! For example,
claims that certain types of vitamins may help relieve stress may be
supported by no scientifically recognized, empirical evidence and
consumers are not likely to see this mentioned anywhere in the
advertisement or on the package label.
Advertiser claims are not typically even evaluated by the Food And
Drug Administration (FDA) to see if they are based on sound evidence
unless the government gets a barrage of consumer complaints, which
rarely ever happens!
Too many claims found on package labels and in ads have no
disclaimers to legally qualify the claims made! Even though many ads
or package labels do not, potentially every ad and package label
should have a disclaimer, or at least some small, fine print somewhere
in the ad or on the package label, to legally qualify what the big
print in the ad or on the package label tries to get away with
promoting!
Disclaimers, or legal qualifying language, at least gives a hint
to consumers that there may be some doubt or questions that could be
raised concerning the claims being made in an advertisement or on the
package label. Without any strict governmental policy, requirements,
rules and/or regulations concerning ad or package label disclaimers,
think of it as a "look the other way" policy. Is this smart
government? This seems to be the policy of many governmental
regulatory bodies at least until a bunch of consumer complaints,
complaints from competitors, consumer advocates, whistleblowers or
the media are made public.
Consequently, beware of the "claim game". While somewhat
truthful, the claims made, followed by their subsequent disclaimers,
all of them may be unclear, exaggerated, confusing and/or misleading!
So, what is the only way to know if a product claim, or a service
claim, is honest or not? You may have to find out for yourself. Do
not rely on government intervention or regulations. For example, a
claim that a product "burns away fat" may just end up burning a hole
in your wallet!
SUPPLEMENTAL SOURCE: NUTRITION ACTION HEALTH LETTER SEPTEMBER 1997
Back
|